Customer replies that eat the day
Inbox back-and-forth keeps interrupting the real work.
Operational friction
Your team should be moving work forward, not spending the day stuck in repetitive handoffs and admin loops.
Inbox back-and-forth keeps interrupting the real work.
The same details get copied between tools again and again.
Updates and summaries take time that should go to decisions.
Workflow examples
Practical AI agents for repetitive work across inboxes, CRMs, sheets, and reporting tools your team already uses.
Workflows are adapted to your team’s current tools and approval steps.
Handle repetitive inbound questions faster while keeping people in the loop.
Capture requests, qualify them, and move them to the right next step.
Move routine information between tools without manual copy-paste.
Pull recurring updates into cleaner summaries for faster review.
Keep routine follow-ups moving without losing consistency.
Add human approval where judgment still matters.
Current pilot focus
These industries are early-fit examples based on repetitive operational load, not a closed list.
Order updates, customer replies, stock-related follow-ups, and routine reporting.
Lead intake, viewing follow-ups, listing updates, and admin-heavy coordination.
Inbound questions, booking prep, reminder flows, and front-desk admin routines.
Client requests, reporting prep, recurring updates, and campaign handoff tasks.
Don’t see your industry here? You can still apply for a pilot if your team is dealing with similar repetitive tasks like customer replies, data entry, or reporting.
How it works
Three steps, one practical goal: remove repetitive work while keeping your team in review where decisions matter.
We quickly map where customer replies, data entry, and reporting are draining team hours today.
We choose low-risk steps for AI agents first and define explicit human oversight checkpoints.
We launch a focused pilot, and your team reviews outputs before any broader rollout.
Founder note
We are early-stage by design, and we work directly with operating teams to automate repetitive work in a way that stays practical, reviewable, and easy to adopt.
I started avintan to help teams with 5 to 50 people stop losing hours to routine tasks like customer replies, data entry, and recurring reports.
Our approach is simple: useful AI agents for specific workflows, human review where judgment matters, and integrations that fit the tools your team already uses.
We do not claim big-scale results we have not earned yet. We share what we are testing, what is working, and what still needs iteration.
Kiril Rabhun
Pilot result placeholder
placeholder: Add one concise pilot outcome here once validated (workflow scope, time saved range, and review rate). No invented metrics before publication-ready proof exists.
Partner example placeholder
placeholder: Add partner example after approval (business type, workflow challenge, rollout notes). Use plain language and avoid unnamed quotes or testimonials.
Practical proof block
FAQ
Quick, plain-spoken details on how the audit works, what fit looks like, and how we handle pilots responsibly.
A 30-minute working session to map your current process, identify 13 repetitive tasks worth automating first, and outline a realistic pilot plan with effort, risks, and next steps.
Usually yes. We start with your existing stack and only propose changes when there is a clear reason. The goal is to fit into current workflows, not force a full tool replacement.
Best fit is teams of roughly 550 people with repeatable operational worklike customer replies, data entry, and reportingand someone on the team who can own rollout decisions.
Every pilot defines checkpoints where people approve, edit, or stop actions before anything critical is sent or finalized. Automation speeds the routine work; your team keeps control of final decisions.
You get early access to pilots and closer founder support. In return, we ask for regular feedback on what saves time, what breaks, and what should be improved before broader rollout.
Because we would rather be accurate than promotional. Until pilots complete with permission to share outcomes, we mark result areas as placeholders instead of posting numbers we cannot stand behind yet.
We’ll map where customer replies, data entry, and reporting can be automated first—without losing human review where it matters.
Limited pilot spots this month. Contact: [email protected]